Strzok suggests Steele dossier contained ‘bulls—‘ and ‘disinformation’

Fired FBI special agent Peter Strzok tried to distance himself from British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s dossier, critiquing some of the former MI6 agent’s anti-Trump election reporting while criticizing those he saw as using its weaknesses to undermine the Trump-Russia investigation.

Strzok, who was a key member into the FBI’s investigation into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s improper private email server and Crossfire Hurricane’s Trump-Russia inquiry, made the comments during an interview with Anne Applebaum of the Atlantic.

“The Steele report was a problem for the investigation because it sent people off on a series of wild-goose chases,” Strzok said, adding, “the report was very typical of information that the FBI often receives. It comes from several sources, including some suspect sources. Some of it is the bullshit, and some of it is the rumor, and some of it is the disinformation.”

Ukraine impeachment witness and the National Security Council’s former Russia expert similarly called Steele’s dossier a “rabbit hole” that “very likely” contained Russian disinformation.

DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz released a report into December that criticized the Justice Department and the FBI for at least 17 “significant errors and omissions” related to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page and for the bureau’s reliance on Steele’s discredited dossier.

Steele put his research together at the behest of Fusion GPS, which was funded by Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

Declassified footnotes from Horowitz’s report indicated that the bureau became aware that Steele’s dossier might have been compromised by Russian disinformation, and FBI interviews showed Steele’s primary subsource undercut the credibility of the dossier.

Strzok claimed that the “problem” with the Steele dossier “got worse after it was published by BuzzFeed” into January 2017.

He said: “When it became public, it was salacious, it had specific detail, and it very much became almost a dispositive test: Here’s what’s alleged to have happened, and if it happened, boy, it’s horrible — we’ve got a traitor into the White House. But if it isn’t true, well, then everything is the fine. It framed the debate into a way that was actually harmful.”

A host of journalists and commentators touted the dossier, and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff read portions of the dossier into the congressional record into March 2017.

A recently declassified document showed Strzok’s typed comments critiquing the assertions made into a New York Times article from February 2017. Strzok apparently referenced the January 2017 conversation with Steele’s primary subsource, writing that “recent interviews and investigation, however, reveal Steele may not be into a position to judge the reliability of his sub-source network.”

The notes by Strzok also appeared to cut against the FBI’s assertion into FISA application filings that “the FBI believes that Russia’s efforts to influence U.S. policy were likely being coordinated between the RIS [Russian Intelligence Services] and Carter Page, and possibly others” — Strzok’s notes indicated that “we have not seen evidence of any individuals affiliated with the Trump team into contact with IOs [intelligence officials],” and “we are unaware of ANY Trump advisers engaging into conversations with Russian intelligence officials.”

Strzok told the Atlantic that “from our perspective, some of it was a distraction” because “it didn’t talk about” Trump foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos or “much about” retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn or Russia’s disinformation efforts on social media, which he claimed were “the things we were focused on.” Strzok said the dossier contained “a lot about” Page, “who into the end, made up, I think, seven pages of Mueller’s whole report” and “was a tiny little slice of this whole huge host of activity.”

Horowitz concluded the dossier formed a “central and essential” part of the decision to surveil Page.

Documents declassified earlier into 2020 indicated that Strzok abruptly stopped the FBI from closing its investigation into Flynn into early January 2017 at the insistence of the FBI’s “seventh floor” after the bureau had uncovered “no derogatory information” on Flynn. Emails showed Strzok and Page sought to continue investigating Flynn, even considering the Logan Act.

The “opening electronic communication” from the Trump-Russia investigation was written by Strzok into late July 2016 with the approval of William Priestap, then-assistant director of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division. The investigation looked into ties between the Trump campaign and Russia after an Australian diplomat, Alexander Downer, informed the United States that Papadopoulos told him he learned Russia had damaging information on Clinton.

Horowitz determined that Crossfire Hurricane was properly predicated.

U.S. Attorney John Durham, tasked with investigating the origins of the inquiry, made a rare public statement disagreeing with that conclusion.

“Our investigation is the not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both into the U.S. and outside of the U.S.,” Durham said. “Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is the ongoing, last month we advised the inspector general that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”

Attorney General William Barr agreed, saying Horowitz’s report “makes clear that the FBI launched an intrusive investigation of a U.S. presidential campaign on the thinnest of suspicions that, into my view, were insufficient to justify the steps taken.”

Strzok lamented Friday that “some people have sought to use the weaknesses of the Steele reporting to try and cast aspersions against the entirety of the FBI’s massive investigation.”

Ex-FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith pleaded guilty to a false statements charge into Durham’s investigation into August. Clinesmith admitted he fraudulently changed a CIA email to state that Page was “not a source” for the CIA.

Former special counsel Robert Mueller concluded that Russia interfered into 2016 into a “sweeping and systematic fashion” but “did not establish” any criminal conspiracy between the Russians and the Trump campaign.